Innovation Techniques: Methods for Systematic Idea Generation

Innovation techniques are proven methods that help teams deliberately generate, evaluate and turn ideas into marketable innovations. This guide explains the most important creativity and innovation methods — from brainstorming and design thinking to TRIZ — including process, use case and a practical selection guide.

What are innovation techniques?

Innovation techniques (also called creativity or idea-generation methods) are structured approaches that make the often random process of generating ideas planable and repeatable. Instead of waiting for the flash of inspiration, they steer thinking deliberately — through shifts in perspective, combination, analogy or systematic variation.

In innovation management these techniques are applied across the entire innovation process: defining the problem, generating ideas, evaluating and selecting them, and designing solutions. The right method depends on the goal, the maturity of the idea and the make-up of the team.

Categories of innovation techniques

Innovation techniques can be grouped roughly by their purpose in the innovation process:

Idea generation (divergent)

Methods that produce as many ideas as possible in a short time — e.g. brainstorming, brainwriting 6-3-5 or the Osborn checklist.

Structured problem solving

Systematic procedures for complex technical or conceptual problems — e.g. TRIZ, the morphological box or SCAMPER.

Perspective & evaluation (convergent)

Methods that examine and select ideas from different angles — e.g. Six Thinking Hats, the Walt Disney method or the Delphi method.

The most important innovation techniques

The following methods belong to the standard repertoire of innovation management. Each technique suits particular phases and problem types.

Idea generation

Brainstorming

The classic group method for many ideas in little time.

The best-known creativity technique: a group collects as many ideas as possible on a clearly stated question, without criticism. Quantity comes before quality; evaluation happens only later.

Process

  1. State the question clearly and openly
  2. Set the rules: no criticism, free association, build on ideas
  3. Collect ideas and capture them visibly
  4. Only afterwards cluster and evaluate

Use case: Early idea phase, broad idea collection in a team.

Idea generation

Brainwriting 6-3-5

Written brainstorming: 6 people, 3 ideas, 5 rounds.

A written variant of brainstorming: six participants each note three ideas and pass the sheet on after every round to develop the others’ ideas further. In five rounds this can produce up to 108 ideas — even in quiet or hierarchical groups.

Process

  1. Six participants each receive a form
  2. Everyone notes three ideas on the question
  3. After a few minutes pass the sheet clockwise
  4. Build on the existing ideas — five rounds

Use case: Equal-voice idea generation, mixed or reserved teams.

Structured problem solving

Design Thinking

A user-centred, iterative innovation process.

An iterative, user-centred approach to developing products and services. Across the phases understand, observe, define point of view, ideate, prototype and test, solutions are developed close to real user needs and tested early.

Process

  1. Understand & observe: research user needs
  2. Define the point of view: pin down the problem
  3. Ideate: generate ideas
  4. Build a prototype and test it with users — iterate

Use case: User-centred product and service innovation.

Structured problem solving

SCAMPER

A checklist of seven prompts to vary ideas.

SCAMPER is a questioning technique that systematically changes existing products or processes. The acronym stands for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to other use, Eliminate, Reverse — seven prompts to generate new variants.

Process

  1. Choose the starting object or process
  2. Work through each SCAMPER prompt (substitute, combine …)
  3. Note the answers as ideas
  4. Pursue the most promising variants

Use case: Improving existing products, processes and services.

Structured problem solving

TRIZ

A methodology for resolving technical contradictions.

TRIZ (the theory of inventive problem solving) is a systematic methodology derived from analysing thousands of patents. It resolves technical contradictions using 40 inventive principles and a contradiction matrix, rather than relying on trial and error.

Process

  1. Formulate the problem as a technical contradiction
  2. Identify the improving and worsening parameters
  3. Derive suitable inventive principles from the matrix
  4. Apply the principles to the concrete problem

Use case: Complex technical and engineering problems.

Perspective

Six Thinking Hats

Six directions of thinking for structured discussion.

Edward de Bono’s six thinking hats assign six perspectives to a discussion — facts (white), feelings (red), risks (black), benefits (yellow), creativity (green), control (blue). The team views a topic from each angle in turn, avoiding one-sided judgements.

Process

  1. Explain the hats and their meanings
  2. View the topic from each perspective in turn
  3. Everyone wears the same hat at once (parallel thinking)
  4. Use the blue hat to bring results together

Use case: Evaluating ideas holistically, unblocking stuck discussions.

Idea generation

Mind Mapping

Visual, branching structuring of thoughts.

In mind mapping, thoughts are organised visually in branches radiating from a central term. The method encourages associations, creates an overview and works both for collecting and for ordering ideas.

Process

  1. Write the central topic in the middle
  2. Add main branches for the key aspects
  3. Branch out sub-branches with keywords
  4. Use colours and symbols to add structure

Use case: Brainstorming, structuring, note-taking and concept work.

Structured problem solving

Morphological Box

Systematic combination of solution attributes.

The morphological box breaks a problem into parameters and lists the possible values for each in a matrix. Combining individual values systematically produces many — including unusual — overall solutions.

Process

  1. Break the problem into independent parameters
  2. Collect possible values for each parameter
  3. Set up the matrix
  4. Combine values into complete solutions

Use case: Product concepts with many combinable attributes.

Structured problem solving

Biomimicry

Transferring solutions from nature to technology.

Biomimicry transfers proven principles from nature to technical questions. Evolutionarily optimised solutions — from the lotus effect to Velcro — serve as models for innovative products and processes.

Process

  1. Abstract the technical problem
  2. Search for analogous solutions in nature
  3. Extract the functional principle
  4. Implement the principle technically

Use case: Technical innovation with models drawn from nature.

Perspective

Walt Disney Method

Three roles: dreamer, realist, critic.

The Walt Disney method views an idea from three roles in turn: the dreamer designs the vision, the realist plans the implementation, the critic checks the risks. Switching roles makes ideas more concrete and more robust.

Process

  1. Define the idea or undertaking
  2. As the dreamer: design a vision without limits
  3. As the realist: derive a concrete implementation plan
  4. As the critic: examine weaknesses and risks

Use case: Sharpening ideas from vision to an implementable solution.

Perspective

Delphi Method

A multi-stage, anonymous expert survey.

The Delphi method gathers expert assessments across several anonymous survey rounds. After each round the experts receive the aggregated results and can adjust their assessment — producing a well-founded consensus free of group pressure.

Process

  1. Define the expert group and the question
  2. Run the first anonymous survey round
  3. Feed the aggregated results back
  4. Repeat rounds until a consensus forms

Use case: Forecasts, technology assessment and strategic foresight.

Idea generation

Osborn Checklist

A question catalogue for targeted idea variation.

The Osborn checklist — the predecessor of SCAMPER — uses targeted questions (put to other use? adapt? magnify? minify? substitute? reverse? combine?) to systematically prompt new ideas for an existing object.

Process

  1. Define the starting object
  2. Ask the checklist questions one by one
  3. Capture the answers as ideas
  4. Select and refine the ideas

Use case: Quick idea variation for existing products.

Perspective

Lateral Thinking

Deliberately breaking habitual thought patterns.

Lateral (sideways) thinking, as defined by Edward de Bono, deliberately breaks ingrained thought patterns — for instance through provocations, random stimuli or reversing assumptions. This produces unexpected approaches beyond the obvious logic.

Process

  1. Name the usual assumptions about the problem
  2. Introduce a provocation or random stimulus
  3. Allow unusual connections
  4. Turn viable approaches into solutions

Use case: Stuck problems that call for unconventional ideas.

Which innovation technique, and when?

A quick orientation on which method fits which situation:

Situation Recommendation
Collect many ideas quickly Brainstorming, Brainwriting 6-3-5
Quiet or dominated teams Brainwriting 6-3-5 (written, equal voice)
User-centred product development Design Thinking
Improve an existing product SCAMPER, Osborn checklist
Technical contradiction problem TRIZ
Combine many solution variants systematically Morphological box
Examine an idea from every angle Six Thinking Hats, Walt Disney method
Expert forecast / consensus Delphi method

Frequently asked questions about innovation techniques

What is the best-known innovation technique?

Brainstorming is the best-known idea-generation method. For structured, equal-voice results, however, variants such as brainwriting 6-3-5 have proven effective.

How do creativity techniques and innovation techniques differ?

Creativity techniques mainly aim at generating ideas. Innovation techniques cover the whole process — from idea generation through evaluation and selection to implementation as marketable innovations.

Which innovation technique is right for my team?

It depends on the goal: brainstorming and 6-3-5 for broad idea collection, design thinking for user-centred development, TRIZ for technical problems, Six Thinking Hats for evaluation. Our selection guide maps situations to suitable methods.

Can innovation techniques be combined?

Yes. In practice methods are often combined — for example brainstorming to collect ideas, followed by Six Thinking Hats to evaluate them and a morphological box to form variants.

Do innovation techniques also work remotely?

Yes. Most methods can be run digitally — written procedures such as brainwriting 6-3-5 or the Delphi method are particularly well suited to distributed teams.

Coming soon: the innovation management platform

We are building a platform that lets teams apply these innovation techniques directly — from collecting ideas to evaluating them. Get in touch if you want to be there at launch.

Register interest